The 29th District Dialog

A Legislative Perspective on Reform in Illinois

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:29:00 +0000

Much has been said about the reform process in Illinois recently. Here are my thoughts on the topic, please feel free to weigh in. As always, I thank you for your interest!

As a senator in the Illinois General Assembly, a long-time fighter and advocate for reform and transparency, and a member of the Joint Committee for Reform, I believe it is appropriate to provide a legislative perspective to the current reform debate, as outlined by the Illinois Reform Commission, chaired by Patrick Collins.

First, let me say Patrick Collins (former Assistant U.S. Attorney and a prosecutor who made the case to convict Governor George Ryan) is right to press for the solid changes his Commission has recommended on how we “do business” in Illinois. The recommendations describe an appropriate agenda for beginning reform. As a reminder, with the help and guidance of the Reform Commission, legislation was passed to clamp down on state contracting; heighten transparency and provide more accessibility on the inner-workings of government (FOIA); and ensure that the public be informed when state employees are involved in misconduct.

Additional and even more critical changes must be considered as well. As an example, we must certainly dig deep into the process of appointments by governors to influential boards and commissions throughout the state. The flaws in this process have been made obvious in the course of indicting Governors Ryan and Blagojevich. We have yet to address fixing the system that allowed the Tony Rezko’s, Stuart Levine’s and William Cellini’s to manage and maintain their control and power throughout the terms of both Republican and Democratic administrations for decades. We must fix the process to prevent the continuation of abuses stemming from unchecked insiders who manage to stay in power and even maintain a seat at the table for decisions on awarding contracts, doling out kickbacks, and recommending patronage positions. Throughout the last several years, regardless of the party in power, they somehow continued to thrive.

So, although we are making a start and have much yet to address, most attention has been focused on reforming state campaign finance. I agree with the Reform Commission’s directive to put the brakes on the ability for elected officials to rake in unlimited dollars to fund their campaigns. In fact, no one disagrees.

The campaign finance bill that passed both chambers imposed contribution limits of $5,000 instead of the $2,400 as requested by the Reform Commission. It also didn’t go as far as the Commission recommended regarding restrictions on how funds can be distributed to campaigns. The passed bill represents a compromise; it is clearly an improvement. No one is saying we are finished. It’s a start. I will continue to work on this effort. In fact, the Senate has filed SB 2458, which designates a task force to continue to address and work on this issue. The passed bill does not go into effect until 2010 – we certainly have time to make more improvements. And we will.

I am committed to continue our quest for changing a system that begs for more accountability and transparency. But let’s not lose sight of the goal: while our reform process has been characterized as a sprint to the finish, the way to accomplish real sustainable reform is to work together long enough to make sure we win the right race. It will take some more time to achieve the goal. It might also include some careful analysis and even some compromise. It will certainly take more than a few weeks. Legislators and reform groups need to work with, not against one another to hammer out necessary solutions. Let’s all keep in mind that although commissions can make recommendations, we all have to work together to pass these recommendations into law.

It is important that we continue to keep the doors open in order achieve the long-term results our citizens deserve. Progress can’t end on May 31, 2009, but instead must continue for many more months. As Mr. Collins pointed out, this may be a cultural change – it will take some time.

Considering Congress

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:45:00 +0000

Just a "heads-up" on an Pioneer Press article that will be appearing in local newspapers. I'd love to know your thoughts and get your input as I weigh this very important decision.

Garrett mulls run for Kirk's seat

April 13, 2009
By JOHN ROSZKOWSKI

State Sen. Susan Garrett said she is seriously considering a bid for 10th Congressional District seat in 2010 should U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk decide to run for U.S. Senate or governor.

Garrett, D-29th, of Lake Forest said she has been contacted by national Democratic Party officials in Washington to consider the 10th District post if it becomes an open seat.

Garrett said she's torn over the decision at this point but is weighing a bid.

"I'm giving it serious consideration, but it's been difficult for me because I love my job as a state senator," she said. "Yet, I understand the opportunity to provide representation to my constituents at the federal level."

Garrett said she plans to make a decision as soon as possible, perhaps in early May. She may take a trip to Washington, D.C. so that she better understands the job requirements of serving in Congress.

"I'd rather make the decision sooner rather than later," said Garrett. "It's a very exciting opportunity, but it requires very careful consideration and thought."

Garrett said she thinks defeating Kirk, a fifth-term Republican congressman from Highland Park, would likely be an uphill battle so Kirk's decision on whether to seek higher office would be a factor in her decision.

"I'm looking at it now because Congressman Kirk is seriously looking at running for U.S. Senate or governor of Illinois," she said. "If it were to be an open seat, it would be much more attractive to run for that office."

Speculation has swirled in recent weeks that Kirk may run as a Republican candidate for governor or for the U.S. Senate seat now held by Roland Burrus, but so far he has made no formal announcement. Kirk could not be reached for comment prior to Pioneer Press' Monday deadline.

Garrett said other factors would play into her decision.

"There are a lot of things to consider that are weighing on my mind," she said. "I am happy where I am in the state senate. I would have to make sure my family would be supportive of any major campaign I'd be involved in ... If I do run, I would work to reach out to every constituent in the 10th Congressional District to let them know that I believe this position is extremely important and I would give it my all."

Garrett said she would also likely face other candidates in the Democratic primary, including possibly Dan Seals, who ran unsuccessfully against Kirk in 2006 and 2008.

"I expect Dan Seals will be strongly considering this as well," she said.

Lauren Beth Gash, chairwoman of the Tenth Congressional District Democrats, said Garrett would certainly be a strong contender for the 10th District seat should she choose to run.

"Susan is a tremendous candidate who is very popular with the voters," she said.

Impeached!

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:22:00 +0000

CLTV

January 29, 2009

Dear Friends,

As you may know I voted this afternoon along with 58 of my colleagues to remove the Governor from office.

I understand if you feel frustrated, distrustful, and disillusioned with your state government. But I want to say that I believe that the worst is behind us. Our new Governor, Pat Quinn, truly is the best person at this juncture to lead our state during such a difficult time. He will not only be refreshing, but he will help Illinois regain its reputation that has been severely tarnished in recent years.

For all of you who have lent me your words of confidence and advice, I want you to know that it did make a difference. Below is a summary of my comments from the Blagojevich impeachment. And as always, feel free to keep in touch!

Based on the evidence I heard and read, I believe that the Governor wanted to have it both ways-when it comes to innocence and guilt-both in his position as Governor over the last six years, and as an impeached Governor as he delivered his final speech to the Senate today in Springfield

On one hand he proclaims and defines his innocence by association to popular populist issues such as providing low-cost prescription drugs, flu vaccines and health care to uninsured families in Illinois. He looks at himself as a savior to the poor and needy.

On the other hand, he denies his guilt by association to lobbyists and others who were willing to participate in the pay to play games, explaining that he did nothing to break the law.

In my mind, I believe that as he continued his mission to resolve problems for those that are powerless, he clearly lost his way. He became obsessed with assuming more and more power and monetary rewards for himself and his future aspirations. In the end, his quest for power, his quest for financial returns for simply doing his job, overrode his commitment to honesty and realistically helping the poor and powerless.

In the end, his personal desire for power and influence left him powerless, and left us with the responsibility to resurrect the office of Governor in the State of Illinois.

The Governor must go!

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:48:00 +0000

Since the news on Governor Blagojevich broke Monday, my office has been inundated with phone calls, emails and faxes requesting the Governor's impeachment and furthermore, that he be stripped of all authority to appoint anyone to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-Elect Barack Obama.

I am in agreement with these requests, and am working to find a realistic solution, leading to both an impeachment and a way to ensure the appointment process is transparent, ethical and cost-effective. I do worry about a special election - based on two problems: First, The Governor can delay the signing of the bill for sixty days, which would in effect prevent the paperwork and the filing of petitions to be completed before the February Primary date. And second, the cost to administer such an election will be about $50 million, an amount which the state does not have in reserve at this time. I have recommended establishing a special nominating panel that would be comprised of non-legislators, and of citizens across the state of the highest reputation and ethical standards. This panel would develop criteria, interview candidates and eventually make the appointment. Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn could be chairman of this panel, as an example.

Either way, I am for moving Illinois out of this quagmire and into a new era, away from political arrogance and corruption.

As many of you know, I have stood up against the Governor and many of his political cronies for years, and most recently pushed back on legislators receiving a 14% pay increase. This was not a popular move with many of my colleagues, but as I said then, and will continue to say today, "We are public servants, working FOR the citizens of the state. Our responsibility is to work on behalf of Illinois taxpayers, and we should never lose sight of that ideal."

An article appeared in the Chicago Tribune on March 2, 2008, "Trial knocks on governor's door." I want to share my quote, just over nine months ago:

"The governor came here riding a white horse as our new ethics czar - but he definitely does not deserve a pass (on the alleged corruption). But I think it is really more important that we as legislators and leaders look into why this continues to happen over and over again."

As always, I appreciate your thoughts and comments.

One week to go!

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:32:00 +0000

With just seven days to go I wanted to share with you this ad that has appeared in our local papers. Your support is very much appreciated!

P.S. Please click the ad image to make larger.

Water-quality hearing

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:40:00 +0000

I think we can all agree that clean water is our most precious resource. Because of recent water testing that has indicated trace amounts of pharmaceuticals appearing in our drinking water, I've decided to hold a hearing on this issue. At this point the United States EPA has not deemed these results harmful; currently our water is safe to drink. Our goal is to find a way to safely and easily dispose of unused medications, rather than have them flushed down toilets or thrown into the garbage, and to ensure that the amounts of medications found in water decreases rather that increases. We will be working closely with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) and are optimistic that we will find a simple long-term solution. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts and ideas.

Water-quality hearing Tuesday

State Sen. Susan Garrett, D-Lake Forest, will conduct a hearing on water quality and the level of pharmaceuticals in drinking water Tuesday in Chicago.

The hearing, before the Illinois Senate Committee on Public Health, which Garrett chairs, will be held at 10 a.m. in the James R. Thompson Center, 100 W. Randolph St., Chicago.

Public health officials, drug company representatives and environmental representatives are expected to attend the hearing.

Garrett said she expects the hearing to draw attention to water quality and to address potential legislative action on the issue.

"We expect to receive testimony from the pharmaceutical industry, as well as counties throughout Illinois who have successfully offered programs to safely discard medications," she said. "Our goal is to eliminate pharmaceuticals from our water supply."

Some seeking new school funding opportunities

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:00:00 +0000

Education funding has been a major issue in Illinois for decades. While there have been attempts to find a more fair funding mechanism, legislatures over the years have always come up empty handed. I believe, because of grass-roots activists, for the first time we will address this issue for a long-term, permanent solution. As always I appreciate your thoughts, ideas and comments.

Suburban leaders still seeking viable funding change

Is there a better way to fund public schools in Illinois? Suburban leaders say yes, even though they haven't seen a workable solution so far.

State Sen. James Meeks, a Chicago Democrat, brought nearly 2,000 Chicago students to the North suburbs Tuesday to protest what he believes is an unfair school-funding system in Illinois, one that favors rich areas over poor ones.

Suburban educators understand Meeks' frustration. But they're not willing to let local districts get hurt in the quest for a solution.

"When people raise questions about the equity of school funding - these are real issues that should be discussed," said Tom Leonard, superintendent of Barrington Area Unit District 220. "But when you're talking about solutions, the concepts we've seen so far tend to fall apart when you look at the nitty-gritty details."

Some have suggested, for example, that local property tax revenue be supplemented with revenue from a statewide tax, like an income or sales tax. Now, Illinois schools derive the bulk of their money from property taxes, which gives property-rich areas an advantage.

Suburban educators, though, say such a "tax swap" would force them to cede some of their resources and control to the state, something they vehemently oppose.

"There's a belief out here that such a plan wouldn't leave suburban districts with enough resources," Leonard said.

State Sen. Susan Garrett, a Lake Forest Democrat, said lawmakers should consider taking a regional approach to the issue, establishing slightly different funding mechanisms for the city, the suburbs and downstate districts.

"That way, each region can raise money in a way that works best," Garrett said. "In the suburbs, we'd retain control of our own system. The money that we pay in taxes would continue to go to our own schools."

For his part, Meeks has proposed a $120 million program that would establish four school clusters in the state and study how they perform in a variety of areas, data that could be used to overhaul the state's funding system down the road.

Robert LeFevre, school board president in Palatine-Schaumburg High School District 211, agrees that new funding systems should be discussed, but he said that money isn't the only factor that determines the quality of education in a particular area.

"The family, for instance, is also important," he said. "As to how you address that issue statewide, I'm not sure. But the entire discussion shouldn't just focus on money."

A lower drinking age?

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:09:00 +0000

Many of you may have read recently that colleges and universities across the country are asking individual states to review the drinking age. They argue that the drinking age should be moved from 21 to 18. This is a provocative debate, as well as a very important issue in our communities. Below is an article from the Pioneer Press focusing on this idea. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts and opinions.

Lake Forest College's president is among more than 100 college presidents and chancellors nationwide who signed an initiative to open discussion on lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18.

College presidents signed on with Amethyst Initiative to start public discussion on how well the 21-year-old drinking policy is working. The three-person staff of the Virginia-based Amethyst Initiative have fielded calls, e-mails and interview requests from small-town newspapers to Time Magazine to the London BBC since the story was leaked to the press one month ahead of schedule, according to Grace Kronenberg of the Amethyst Initiative.

"This is the best evidence we have of the need for discussion. People have sat up and taken notice," she said.

Locally, Lake Forest College President Stephen Schutt said in a written statement that he joined with Amethyst Initiative to "help start a conversation about the way the laws surrounding drinking in our country could work more effectively," he said. "I have not decided that lowering the drinking age is the right course of action for our society to take, but I do believe that it should be given full and serious consideration, and this is what a genuine national conversation could produce."

State Sen. Susan Garrett said she, too, thinks a debate on the topic is a good idea, but admitted she has "mixed feelings about" lowering the drinking age.

"I fought so hard to be sure parents have so much more responsibility to prevent underage drinking," Garrett said last week.

Amethyst Initiative and college presidents argue that the higher drinking age promotes binge drinking on college campuses, which college's might be better able to handle if the drinking age were lowered to 18.

"Lowering the drinking age to 18 could make it possible for colleges and universities to model responsible drinking behavior on campus," Schutt said in his statement.

Garrett is not convinced.

"Would that eliminate binge drinking? I don't know. I'm not an expert. We need to bring experts together to have that discussion. I say, let's open it up, let's discuss it, let's weigh the pros and cons," Garrett said.

Lake Forest Police Chief Joe Buerger has no qualms about stating his opinion on lowering the drinking age.

"As a law enforcement executive, I don't support the lowering of the drinking age," Buerger said. "Statistics show there were fewer accidents and fewer young adults killed after the drinking age was raised."

The International Association of Chiefs of Police said in a statement issued Friday that raising the drinking age to 21 has saved more than 25,000 lives since 1984, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics.

"Lowering the minimum drinking age to 18 is both misguided and dangerous," IACP President Ronald Ruecker said in the statement. "Lowering the national drinking age would inevitably lead to more tragedies for more families."

According to the IACP, research shows young drivers (age 16 to 21) comprise 7 percent of all drivers in the U.S., yet they are involved in 15 percent of all alcohol-related fatalities -- a trend they believe would increase if the drinking age were lowered.

Jared Fox, a senior at Lake Forest College, thinks it is unfair that he can "sign up to die in a war" at the age of 18 but "cannot have a beer with my friends."

He supports the Amethyst Initiative to open discussion on lowering the drinking age.

"Reducing the drinking age to 18 or another lower number would decrease the current drinking atmosphere. Currently, students are binge drinking in high levels," he said. Fox said minors are more likely to binge drink because alcohol consumption is illegal for them.

"Minors will obtain alcohol and try to drink as much of it as they possibly can in a small time" because they don't know when they will have the opportunity to drink again, he said. "If the age was lowered, colleges would be able to talk about the issue with students who are currently identified as minors and to instill good drinking habits in them.

"Right now, you can't tell these individuals how to drink because they aren't supposed to be drinking anyway. The fact is, though, most of them have formed drinking habits much earlier than college."

My e-waste legislation makes USA Today!

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:36:00 +0000

As many of you know, I have been working for two years to ensure that the residents of Illinois have an environmentally-acceptable program in which to dispose of cell phones, T.V.s, printers, computers and other electronic devices. The Bill (SB 2313) has passed both chambers and is awaiting the Governor's signature. I'm pleased and proud that USA Today has featured this legislation and its importance across the country. Please feel free to comment or provide your input!

States: Keep old TVs out of landfills
A survey conducted this year by the Consumer Electronics Association indicates only 12% of households with analog TVs say they will buy a new digital TV. About 48% of respondents said they plan to buy a converter box.

As the switch to digital TV nears, concern about old TVs piling up in landfills has prompted state and local governments to develop recycling programs.

New York City and 11 states have passed laws, including four this year, to set up television recycling programs paid for by manufacturers, according to the Electronics TakeBack Coalition, an alliance of non-profit groups that promote responsible recycling. And California has a law that requires people to pay for TV recycling.

On Feb. 17, TV broadcasts will switch from analog signals to digital. The switch, mandated by Congress in 2005, will be the biggest change in TV technology since the leap from black-and-white to color a half-century ago.

To avoid a blank screen, households with analog TVs will need to do one of three things: Subscribe to cable or satellite service, get a converter box or buy a digital TV. About 70 million TVs nationwide could be affected because they rely on antennas to receive free over-the-air signals.

In Illinois, the TV switch helped win support this year for a bill that requires manufacturers to pay for the recycling of TVs and computers, said the bill's sponsor, Democratic state Sen. Susan Garrett. It passed the Legislature last month, and Gov. Rod Blagojevich is expected to sign it, spokesman Lucio Guerrero said.

We Did It!

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:41:00 +0000

State Sen. Susan Garrett (D-Lake Forest) and Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) (right) leave a meeting before the Senate voted down a measure to boost lawmakers' pay by 7.5 percent.

Thank you for all your help and your support. I am proud to say that the pay raise has been rejected, finally, by my colleagues in the Senate. I appreciated all of your emails and phone calls and in the end, it "paid off"! Below is the complete article from The Chicago Tribune on the vote.

State Senate votes against pay raises
President Emil Jones, who had said, 'I need a raise,' votes 'present' with 2 others

SPRINGFIELD — The Illinois Senate rejected a 7.5 percent pay increase Tuesday in the face of withering criticism from voters who feared lawmakers would sneak the raises through after they were safely re-elected in November.

But don't cry too hard for state lawmakers—they just got a 3.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment July 1. The mere possibility that they could so quickly raise their own pay again served as a focal point for citizen outrage.

Senate President Emil Jones (D-Chicago) had angled for more money this spring, unabashedly declaring: "I need a pay raise. I need a pay raise." But with lawmakers unexpectedly in town this week, Jones changed his mind and allowed the vote.

After a resounding round of denunciations, senators voted 47-0 to kill the proposal. The House already had rejected the raises. Had the Senate not done the same thing, the new 7.5 percent salary increase would have taken effect automatically by next summer.

Sen. Susan Garrett (D-Lake Forest), who spearheaded the push to block the raises, said accepting them would send the wrong message to taxpayers when the reeling economy has left "people hurting and losing their jobs."

The opposition also extended to Republicans.

"It is truly not the time for us to have our hands out," Senate Minority Leader Frank Watson (R-Greenville) said. "I personally think the state government is in shambles. Nothing's getting done."

A few months ago, Sen. Rickey Hendon (D-Chicago) used his role as Senate Rules Committee chairman to prevent a vote on the pay raises. But Hendon offered a different message Tuesday, saying it is not the "right time" for a salary boost.

Lawmakers should not get pay increases when they have failed to approve school funding reforms or pass a statewide construction program, Hendon said, citing the reasons Gov. Rod Blagojevich called them into special session.

Three Chicago Democrats—Jones and Sens. Kwame Raoul and Donne Trotter—voted "present," the political equivalent of taking a pass.

Jones had left open the option that senators would wait until after the Nov. 4 election to vote on the pay hikes. That's what they did two years ago. This year, pay raise opponents pressed him for a vote.

Yet Jones emphatically dismissed the notion that senators had caved to public pressure.

"Let's stop playing games with this issue," said Jones, who lashed out at outspoken pay raise critics like Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn for "hypocrisy, game-playing, grandstanding."

So for now, rank-and-file lawmakers will make $67,833 a year for what's billed as a part-time job and legislative leaders will pull in close to $100,000.

Blagojevich summoned lawmakers to the Capitol specifically to debate education funding. But without any legislation to consider, the House adjourned after 21 minutes and the Senate mostly met privately.

Sen. James Meeks (D-Chicago) called it "appalling" and "disappointing" that Blagojevich failed to present an education reform plan Tuesday. The senator, pastor of a large South Side church, has called for a boycott by Chicago Public Schools students on Sept. 2—their first day of school—saying they should try to enroll in the wealthy north suburban New Trier Township High School District. The governor instead headed in late afternoon to the Illinois State Fair cattle barns for the annual grand champion auction—a decision that angered lawmakers.

"He did not call a special session to deal with cows," Meeks said. "He called a special session to deal with kids."

Blagojevich defended his school-funding efforts.

"It was time for them to put up or shut up," Blagojevich said. "And, unfortunately, they talked a big game but didn't put their money where their mouths are."

New law OKs GPS to enforce protection orders

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:25:00 +0000

The Governor signed an important piece of legislation into law on Monday that will further protect citizens from people violating restraining orders with the help of GPS devices. I think this is an important step forward after the terrible tragedy revolving around Cindy Bischof. I sponsored this legislation (Senate Bill 2719) and worked very closely with the Bischof family to ensure that we addressed all aspects of potential tragedies as they relate to domestic violence. As you can see, (check left side of above photo) I attended the bill signing ceremony in Chicago yesterday. The full article from the Sun-Times is posted below.

The Cindy Bischof Law | Woman killed after judge had no authority for device

Harassed by an ex-boyfriend who constantly violated court orders of protection, Cindy Bischof once asked a judge to make her stalker wear a GPS device that could warn authorities if he approached her home or job.

The judge said he didn't have the authority to do so, and on March 7th of this year, Bischof was shot to death in a parking lot outside her place of work in Elmhurst. Her assailant then killed himself.

On Monday, 150 days later, Gov. Blagojevich signed the Cindy Bischof law, which gives judges the power to impose GPS monitoring on anyone violating an order of protection.

The devices will automatically notify a monitoring service if the wearer violates "geographic exclusion zones" such as homes or workplaces, as determined by the court.

Monitors, in turn, will notify local law enforcement and send warnings via text or cell phone to potential victims.

"She was gunned down at work," said Bischof's brother Michael, whose family had worked to get the law passed. And though Bischof said nobody can be sure if this new system would have prevented his sister's death, "She would have been notified in advance and known he was in the area."

The new law could also give victims of domestic violence peace of mind, according to Bischof, who added that before his sister was killed she was terrorized for nine months and had to move several times.

"From this day forward, victims of stalking and harassment will gain back some of their personal freedom by finally placing the burden of movement on the offender rather than the victims themselves," Bischof said.

Blagojevich, who signed the bill in a ceremony at the Jane Addams Hull House Uptown Center, also dropped hints that he will soon be making extensive use of his amendatory veto power.

Problem gamblers need more help, lawmakers say

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:42:00 +0000

As Illinois considers awarding its 10th casino license, I believe that casinos must cover the cost of dealing with gaming and gambling addictions as a result of the presence of local casinos. Other states have appropriated much more funding to this issue than Illinois has. The Daily Herald has been investigating this issue, below is the most recent in a series of articles. Additional articles from the week are linked below the printed story. As always, I'd be interested in your views on this matter.

Several suburban lawmakers are hoping to expand treatment options for gambling addicts and study the impact of casinos after a Daily Herald analysis of the state's gambling industry.

"This is really sad," said state Sen. Susan Garrett, a Lake Forest Democrat, regarding what the three-day series revealed.

Among the findings:

• Casinos are rolling out tighter slot machines to keep revenue up in the face of declining foot traffic, ensuring continued profits and higher tax revenue to the state.

• Illinois lags far behind other Midwestern states in providing treatment options for gambling addicts.

• Lawmakers have not spent any money to study the impact of legalized gambling since introducing the lottery or casinos, though they continued to push for even more expansion.

• A disproportional amount of gambling addicts who ban themselves from casinos live in cities with casinos, suggesting a local pattern of problem gambling.

Lawmakers from across the suburbs, and across the aisle, reacted to the series by saying the state should do more to keep an eye on the casino industry and provide help for gambling addicts.

"It is shameful," said state Sen. Kirk Dillard, a Hinsdale Republican. "If we are raking in billions of dollars in revenue from compulsive gambling, we need to take care of those people who need our help."

State Rep. Ruth Munson, an Elgin Republican, said she has requested the House research team investigate Illinois' safety net for problem gamblers. She also is asking for research on video-based slot machines that withhold more money from gamblers.

"The decision was made in this state to fund state programs with gambling, and with that comes a responsibility to ensure there are programs for those who are harmed," Munson said.

Similar concerns were expressed by state Reps. Fred Crespo, a Hoffman Estates Democrat; Elaine Nekritz, a Des Plaines Democrat; and Mark Beaubien, a Barrington Hills Republican, as well as state Sen. Terry Link, a Waukegan Democrat. They also said it will be hard to find money for more treatment with a $2 billion budget shortfall, despite the more than $1 billion that legalized gambling brings the state.

For her part, Garrett said casinos should pick up the tab.

"This isn't about whether you are for or against casinos," she said. "We need to determine how we can better assist people with a severe gambling addiction problem."

Meanwhile, Senate President Emil Jones Jr. and House Speaker Michael Madigan, both Chicago Democrats, refused to address the issues raised by the Daily Herald.

Illinois Gaming Board Chairman Aaron Jaffe declined an interview request. A board spokesman said the issues raised by the newspaper didn't fall within his purview.

A spokesman for Gov. Rod Blagojevich insisted the state is "always looking for ways to determine the effects gaming has on communities in Illinois."

When asked for an example, spokesman Dave Rudduck couldn't provide one. There is no public record of any state spending on such research.

Rudduck said the governor supports treatment funding for gambling addicts and that is why he didn't cut any of the $960,000 set aside for such programs despite budget problems this year.

Blagojevich and Jones have pushed for a dramatic expansion of legalized gambling in Illinois as a way to fund a major public works program. At the same time, the state is preparing to auction off a 10th casino license in the coming months.

Other related stories:
Where do problem gamblers live? (7/22)
Is Illinois gambling with addiction? (7/21)
What's problem gambling? (7/21)

The pay raise issue continues

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:56:00 +0000

As you know, I have been an outspoken critic of legislators receiving a pay raise this year. Including a cost of living increase (COLA), legislators will receive almost a 14% pay hike which I believe is unacceptable, especially given our Illinois economy and the fact that we haven't balanced the budget and are requesting other state employees and agencies to accept major budget cuts. I intend to submit legislation in the Fall that will reform how legislators receive and vote on future pay raises.

Below is a Chicago Tribune article on the matter published last week, and please click here to read the latest Chicago Tribune editorial on legislative pay raises.

I welcome your insight and input and any comments you may have on this issue.

Senators avoiding Statehouse to protect post-election pay raises
Returning to Springfield would force them to vote on 7.5% wage hike

By Ray Long and Jeffrey Meitrodt

SPRINGFIELD — The House is back this week to fight Gov. Rod Blagojevich's budget cuts, but the Senate is avoiding the Statehouse in a move that protects lawmakers' chances of getting a post-election pay raise.

Senate President Emil Jones (D-Chicago) has said there is no need for the Senate to meet because his chamber, unlike the House, has already approved funding plans that would alleviate the need for the governor's veto of $1.4 billion in spending from the new state budget.

But critics said returning to Springfield also would force the Senate to vote on whether to boost base salaries for lawmakers next summer by 7.5 percent, to $72,985. Jones has not scheduled the Senate to return until after the November election, when it would be less volatile for lawmakers to take a vote.

A consistent advocate of boosting legislative salaries, Jones made his position clear this year when he told reporters: "I need a pay raise. I need a pay raise."

Legislative leaders, already paid more, would receive more than $100,000. The hefty salaries of the governor, other statewide officials and judges would rise too.

Sen. Susan Garrett (D- Lake Forest), who has fought the pay raise and wants a pre-election vote, contended the Senate is shirking its responsibility to tackle budget issues now because some senators want to protect salary hikes.

"Some people in leadership would rather us not be in Springfield because we would not have to address the pay raise," she said.

Jones spokeswoman Cindy Davidsmeyer denied that the pay-raise issue is why the Senate is not planning to come back until after the election.

Illinois has a quirky system designed to give lawmakers political cover. Both the House and Senate must reject the pay raises recommended every two years by a special commission or they automatically take effect. In some cases, that can result in proposed pay raises coming one right after another.

That's the case this year. Lawmakers got a 3.8 percent cost-of-living increase to their base salary of $65,353 as part of the new state budget that took effect July 1.

The ball is in the Senate's court. The House already voted down the pay hike.

Two years ago, Jones did not allow proposals to reject pay raises to be voted upon until after the election. Safely re-elected, Jones and his colleagues defeated a move to turn down the pay raises, which then took effect.

Rep. Fred Crespo (D- Hoffman Estates) led the House's effort to oppose pay raises and wants senators to vote before the election.

"If they don't," he said, "I really have to question their motives."

Garrett to introduce ethics bill

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:24:00 +0000

As legislators begin the Summer recess from session, it is important that we reflect on what we've done and what we need to get done next Fall. I like to take the opportunity of time away from Springfield to really brainstorm on how I can introduce more effective, more sweeping, and more thoughtful legislation during the next General Assembly. The Des Plaines Journal spoke with me about ethics legislation I plan on introducing next Fall. The full article is posted below. Your comments, as always, are welcomed.

Garrett to introduce ethics bill
In the wake political fundraiser Tony Rezko’s conviction last week on 16 counts of government corruption, Ill. State Sen. Susan Garrett (D-29th) told the Journal she plans on introducing sweeping ethics reform legislation when the state legislature re-convenes next fall.

“I don't think anyone is proud of our government at this moment. The real question is how can we prevent future Rezkos?” said Garrett.

In an earlier press conference last week before the conviction Garrett told reporters she would introduce legislation to overhaul the Ill. Compensation Review Board that sets pay for lawmakers. She said the review board members needed to be better vetted and disqualified for conflicts of interest. Garrett has been down this reform road before. In 2003 Garrett saw her ethics reform legislation made law.

“I believe there should be zero tolerance in the Illinois General Assembly and the State of Illinois for these types of corrupt, self-dealing schemes,” said Garrett.
“Personally and professionally, I feel deceived. In 2003, I sponsored the most sweeping and comprehensive ethics bill for government officials and employees in the history of the General Assembly, and this is what we have to show for it.”

Garrett said she is seeking constituent feedback and will formulate legislation during the legislature’s break. Prosecutors said Rezko hand picked people to serve on state boards. Through these boards state contracts were then alleged to have been awarded to contributors to Rod Blagojevich’s campaign for governor. Garrett said the governor and top legislative leaders appoint members of state boards and commissions with no real vetting process. She said legislators are given a list of appointees the same day they vote for them on the floor of the legislature.

“There must be a vetting process so the Rezko’s and Stewart Levine’s can’t influence the process,” said Garrett.

Garrett said she has received a lot of constituent feed back on the issue since Rezko’s conviction last week. Rezko said he would appeal his conviction but would begin serving his sentence immediately. Gov. Blagojevich has not been charged with any wrongdoing.

Highland Park Township High School District 113 gets green gas

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:04:00 +0000

As the country begins to evolve away from the use of gasoline, both because of costs and because of the environmental effects, it's interesting to see how local communities are taking action. Highland Park's School District 113 has recently unveiled a new fueling station that dispenses alternative fuel E85—which is considered cleaner and cheaper than traditional gasoline. This is the fourth E85 station in Lake County and available to 113 school district vehicles that are fitted for flex fuels. This is something I am happy to support and hope to see more of in the future, especially when it can have an impression on students. For more information on E85 fuel and vehicles, click here. I've also posted the full Chicago Tribune article below.

Highland Park Township High School District 113 gets green gas
System gets E85 station to help curb fuel costs

School board member Harvey Cohen opened the gas tank of a Chevy Suburban on Thursday, flipped the lever on a gleaming new fueling station and dispensed 40 gallons of E85, an alternative fuel praised as cleaner and cheaper than traditional gasoline.

It was part of the unveiling of what Highland Park-based Township High School District 113 says is only the fourth E85 station in Lake County, and the first dedicated for use by a school district. With more local governments turning to alternative fuel, district officials said, it became apparent that the vehicles needed somewhere nearby to fill up.

E85 is so-named because it's a blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline. The new fuel station isn't open to the public, though the district will allow municipalities within its boundaries, like the Village of Deerfield, to fill up at the station at the market price.

As for what that market price is, district spokeswoman Carol Votsmier said she's not sure yet, as the district hasn't gotten its first bill. Votsmier said the district expects the fuel to cost about 25 percent less than regular gasoline.

E85 can be used only in flexible fuel vehicles, which the school district began buying in the past year, including the Chevy Suburban. The SUV isn't exactly the image of environmental consciousness, but Votsmier said the nine-passenger vehicle is used for transporting smaller clubs and teams. The other option would be using a school bus to transport a handful of students, she said, which would be worse.

The fuel is not perfect, critics say, with some finding it getting less mileage than regular gas.

A 2007 Stanford University study focusing on E85 found ethanol fumes could cause more health problems than gasoline, especially for people with respiratory problems or asthma.

But on Thursday, the focus was on reducing petroleum dependency—something Highland Park received attention for in 2005, when the city began switching its old police cruisers to Toyota Priuses.

"This is what school is all about, practicing what you preach, leading by example," said State Sen. Susan Garrett (D- Lake Forest). Shedrove to the event in a Hybrid Escape.

Deerfield High School sophomore Tim Letten, 15, watched the fueling as he waited for his driver's education class to start and was pleased by what he saw.

"I think it's great the district took the initiative. We talk about global warming so much in class, and this shows you can live a green life," Letten said.

Helping the homeless in Lake County

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:31:00 +0000

[Photo: North Chicago Mayor Leon Rockingham, State Rep. Eddie Washington and Senator Susan Garrett at a press conferece to highlight the need for funding PADS Homeless Shelter]

As Cook County's northerly neighbor, most think of Lake County as a quieter, gentler, more suburban county. Still, many in Lake County face homelessness and need the resources to help them improve their situation. I am leading an effort to raise about $350,000 for PADS Crisis Services Inc., the county's homeless shelter. PADS was founded in 1972 as a crisis hotline. The mission of PADS has evolved to combat chronic poverty, welfare dependency, and homelessness among individuals and families; by providing emergency shelter and crisis services throughout northeast Illinois—housing no less than 160 people per night, October – April. We cannot ignore this problem, just because it is nearly invisible. Please click here to make a donation to Lake County PADS, a registered 501(c)(3) charity.

Helping the homeless in Lake Co.
PADS asks for donations, says they've seen 17% increase in clients in last year

There always will be those who for one reason or another find themselves homeless, but economic realities are boosting the numbers in Lake County.

"In Lake County, people don't think we have a problem. We sort of contain the issue, we don't talk about it," said state Sen. Susan Garrett of Lake Forest.

Garrett, who is leading an effort to raise about $350,000 for PADS Crisis Services Inc., the county's homeless shelter, was joined by several political leaders Tuesday for a press conference at PADS headquarters in North Chicago.

The agency is short on money because of local, state and federal funding cuts. With no extra help expected from those sources, Garrett and others are taking the matter public.

"The statistics are growing and they'll continue to grow unless we start right here, right now," said North Chicago Mayor Leon Rockingham Jr.

On a given night, there are about 400 homeless people in Lake County. PADS runs emergency shelters from Oct. 1 through April 30 but offers a variety of other services that are being stretched thin.

During the past year, PADS has provided nearly 25,000 nights of emergency shelter and more than 327,000 meals. Officials emphasized the problem is not confined to less affluent areas.

"I want you to know it's in Deerfield, too," said Julie Morrison, supervisor of West Deerfield Township. "PADS is just not here in this building."

According to the agency, the number of unduplicated new clients rose 17 percent the past year and included a 48 percent increase in children. About 63 percent of those who entered the program came from the streets, parks, bus or bus stations.

A rise in foreclosures, higher gas and food prices and increasing unemployment are adding to the need, officials said. More families, children and veterans have been seeking help.

"It touches all of us. All of us, our families and friends at one time or another have fallen on hard times," said Audrey Nixon, a Lake County board member whose district includes North Chicago.

Those seeking help have included people like Chicago resident Joan Evans, who about two weeks ago suddenly found herself homeless.

"My landlord lost the building. We didn't have a choice," she said. "No notice. No anything."

She said she's staying in a PADS family center in Waukegan with her three children aged 2, 3, and 4 while looking for a job.

The fundraising effort will focus on public and private resources, including corporations and foundations.

Those interested in donating are asked to contact Cathy Curran, PADS executive director, at (847) 689-4357, Ext. 122; at Ccurran@lakecountypads.org; or by visiting the Web site, www.lakecountypads.org.

The Rezko verdict: Guilty

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:50:00 +0000

I believe there should be zero tolerance in the Illinois General Assembly and the State of Illinois for these types of corrupt, self-dealing schemes. Personally and professionally, I feel deceived. In 2003, I sponsored the most sweeping and comprehensive ethics bill - for government officials and employees - in the history of the General Assembly, and this is what we have to show for it. I don't think anyone is proud of our government at this moment. The real question is, how can we prevent future Rezkos? Check the full Sun-Times article by clicking here or read below. Your comments, as always, are welcomed.

The Rezko verdict: Guilty
Political fund-raiser's conviction gives Gov. Blagojevich plenty to worry about

In a crushing blow to Gov. Blagojevich and a potentially damaging one to presidential hopeful Barack Obama, Tony Rezko -- a fund-raiser for the two men and an ex-gubernatorial confidant -- was convicted of far-reaching corruption Wednesday.

The verdict quickly raised questions about whether the state's chief executive will be the next target of federal prosecutors.

A federal jury in Chicago on Wednesday convicted Tony Rezko on 16 of 24 charges he faced in a political corruption trial that cast a harsh light on the Blagojevich administration.

"We're moving at full speed," a source with knowledge of the probe said. Authorities investigating the Blagojevich administration "will be knocking on doors as early as [this] morning."

A fast food entrepreneur and real estate developer, Rezko once lived a life of North Shore opulence, hosting dignitaries and fund-raisers in his Wilmette mansion. Rezko, 52, now faces the prospect of a lengthy prison term.

After deliberating over 12 days, the jury of 10 women and two men convicted Rezko on 16 of 24 counts that accused him of corrupting two state boards and using his influence in Blagojevich's inner circle to squeeze cash from firms seeking state business.

The two-month trial laid bare an ugly underbelly of Illinois politics, in which high-rollers and powerbrokers secretly called the shots on state deals.

"What the jury did was vindicate the interests of the citizens of Illinois and honest government," U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald said.

Jurors said their verdict had nothing to do with Blagojevich or Obama -- neither of whom was charged in the case.

Before the verdict was read, Rezko entered the courtroom smiling, wearing a crisp, taupe suit and the same red tie he wore the first day of trial, his two sons at his side. But from the first reading of "guilty," Rezko's smile faded, his hands clasped tightly before him, his face, at times, flushed.

He turned his gaze away from jurors and later appeared to swallow back emotion after mouthing a message to one of his sons. Minutes before turning himself in to federal custody, Rezko moved to a bench to sit between his sons, their eyes swollen from crying, their arms around their father.

Family and friends filled two courtroom benches, some wiping tears as the verdict was read. His wife and daughter were not there. The prosecution sought to revoke Rezko's $8 million bail. But Rezko surrendered voluntarily, releasing dozens of properties belonging to family and friends.

"Mr. Rezko, on his own, decided that if he was convicted he wanted to immediately start serving his sentence," said Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy, who said he'll appeal.

The conviction ratchets up the pressure on Rezko, who's set to be sentenced Sept. 3, to cooperate with authorities.

It also gives the feds the green light on separate probes involving the governor's finances and hiring practices. Already, investigators have subpoenaed his campaign fund, scrutinized his donors, looked into his wife's real estate dealings and questioned witnesses on whether they were promised perks for cash, sources told the Sun-Times. A 2006 letter from Fitzgerald revealed his office was probing "allegations of endemic hiring fraud" in state government.

The verdict is an embarrassment to Blagojevich, who vowed to transform the corrupt ways of his predecessor, the now-imprisoned former Gov. George Ryan. But witnesses invoked Blagojevich's name repeatedly in Rezko's trial, saying he talked to them about winning state business, jobs or access after they anted up to his campaign.

Blagojevich said he was sad for Rezko and his family. "The jury's decision is yet another reminder that ours is a system of government that is ruled by laws, and not by men," the governor said.

Obama was a tangential figure at the trial, mentioned only a few times as a beneficiary of Rezko's fund-raising. But Republicans are already exploiting the Democrat's long friendship with a now-convicted felon.

Rezko carried out his crimes with onetime Republican party insider Stuart Levine, who served on two state boards. Levine has pleaded guilty to fraud charges tied to Rezko and testified against him, in hopes of winning a 67-month sentence.

Witnesses testified Rezko used his influence to stack the Illinois health planning board and teachers pension board. Rezko then directed dealings through a middleman who at times passed out index cards with voting instructions.

Witnesses said Rezko was influential in Blagojevich's administration, trumping others when it came to getting state appointments. In all, Rezko raised more than $1.3 million for the governor.

Rezko's fall came as dramatically as his rise. The Syrian immigrant came to Chicago in the 1970s and amassed a fortune from real estate dealings and Papa John's and Panda Express fast-food franchises. That world came crashing down as Rezko found himself deep in debt, facing lawsuits, foreclosure and three criminal cases.

Lawmakers want pay hike system scrapped

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Fri, 30 May 2008 14:34:00 +0000

In addition to my belief that our legislative pay-raise should be rejected, I am also committed to reforming the entire pay-raise process. After much research, I have decided to introduce legislation that will do the following:

-Insure that raises are not automatic.
-Establish standards and criteria on which to base raises.
-Insure that the board members who oversee the raises have no conflict of interest with legislators, judges, state's attorneys and the executive branch of Illinois government.
-Create a website where minutes of the meeting are posted and the hearing on pay-raises are covered via webcast.

In Springfield on Thursday I participated in a press conference where I outlined this reform package. As you can see, some of the media has already picked it up. Your comments, as always, are welcome.

Lawmakers want pay hike system scrapped

While Senate President Emil Jones and his new chairman of the Senate Rules Committee have so far managed to avoid holding up-or-down votes on a pair of resolutions aimed at blocking legislative pay raises, the topic continues to rile up lawmakers who don’t think it’s appropriate to receive an 11.7 percent salary hike during a recession.

Fifteen lawmakers from the House and Senate gathered Thursday to denounce Jones' tactics and demand a Senate vote on the issue. The pay increases would push lawmakers’ base yearly salaries to $73,000 and also boost the pay of judges and statewide officials such as Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Sen. Matt Murphy (R-Palatine) said the actions of Jones and Sen. Rickey Hendon (D-Chicago), the rules chairman, are a "great illustration of the abuse of power" in Springfield, and he urged his colleagues to support a bill he plans to reintroduce next year that would free bills trapped in Hendon's committee if a majority of lawmakers in the chamber have signed on as co-sponsors.

Lawmakers noted that such a measure would have allowed the Senate to take a vote on the pay raises because Sen. Susan Garrett (D-Lake Forest) has gathered 29 co-sponsors for her resolution opposing the hikes, or enough to pass the measure. Hendon told committee members last week he would not let Garrett’s resolution come up for a vote this spring. The rules committee is often described by lawmakers as a place where bills go to die if they are not supported by legislative leaders.

The House already has rejected the pay raises, which will take effect automatically unless the Senate also votes them down in six session days, according to Garrett and Rep. Fred Crespo (D-Hoffman Estates).

Garrett and other lawmakers said the ruckus over raises shows that the system of awarding the pay hikes is flawed and needs to be reformed. The most obvious thing that needs to happen, they said, is that lawmakers should be required to cast an affirmative vote to get the raises. Under a complicated process designed to insulate lawmakers from political fallout, the raises are set by a state review board and take effect unless both the House and Senate reject the recommendation.

Thanks to all who help out the vets

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 27 May 2008 02:11:00 +0000

From the Civil War to the current war in Iraq, Memorial Day has been celebrated for well over one hundred years. We honor U.S. men and women who perished while in military service to their country for making the ultimate sacrifice to protect our freedom. Now more than ever it is crucial that we can do everything possible as legislators to try and give back to veterans and families for their heroic service. I was able to pass the Returning Warrior Homestead Exemption Act—a law that provides qualifying Veterans a one-time $5,000 reduction to their home’s equalized assessed value (EAV). Qualifying Veterans who return from active duty in an armed conflict involving the U.S. armed forces can file an application upon their return home to receive this exemption. It is scratching the surface in an effort that the government, both state and federal, needs to make in increasing benefits and standards for the military and its veterans. I hope everybody had a safe and reflective holiday weekend.

As we approach Memorial Day, I would be remiss as the superintendent for the Veterans Assistance Commission of Lake County if I did not recognize the many efforts being conducted on behalf of veterans by veterans in Lake County.

During this past year the veterans have contributed over 16,000 hours of volunteer time to North Chicago VAMC and to their local community.

Congratulations to Rick Coombe of Winthrop Harbor as he completes his year as the Illinois Department Commander for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Rick had a successful year at the state level as well as Rich Henry, the 5th VFW District Commander for Lake County and Jean Keehn, the American Legion 10th District Commander. The benefactor of their efforts has been the veterans at North Chicago VAMC.

I need to thank the many member posts of the Veterans Assistance Commission for their efforts in bringing the Virtual Vet Program to our office.

Johnnie Allen continues to serve the veterans by representing our office two days a week at North Chicago VAMC and I thank Director Pat Sullivan and his staff for making his efforts possible at the Medical Center.

The VAC joined CLC for a ceremony Friday to honor the 19 service members from Lake County who lost their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan. Wayne Maczko and his fellow committee members have done a superb job in preparing the ceremony and the start of work on their veterans memorial.

On the legislative front, I need to thank state Sen. Susan Garrett for her efforts in passing legislation to make technical changes to the Returning Warrior Homestead Exemption Act. The changes were brought to our attention by the staff of the Lake County Assessment Office. This was an excellent example of state and county officials working together for the benefit of our veterans.

Two other officials are U.S. Representatives Melissa Bean and Mark Kirk. Together they are sponsoring an amendment to HR 5658, the Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. Their amendment will waive out-of-pocket expenses for military retirees who would use North Chicago VAMC.

An issue that is not resolved is funding for staff at our state-managed veterans homes. We have empty beds at Manteno and LaSalle due to shortage of staff. At the same time, we have a waiting list for both facilities. Please join me in urging our legislature and the governor to fully fund these facilities. These facilities will be the final home for many of our greatest generation, they have earned and deserve the best we can give them.

I want to thank my staff: Johnnie Allen, my mentor who has served the veterans of Lake County for the past 16 years as superintendent; Mary Ann Kornau-Bandurski and Sherry Kruse who recently completed the USERRA Training Program to assist Guard and Reserve Members with their re-employment rights and the delegates to the VAC who are the ultimate volunteers.

Michael P. Peck Superintendent,

VAC of Lake County

Pharmaceutical waste in drinking water

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Tue, 20 May 2008 20:25:00 +0000

Nationwide there is growing concern about pharmaceutical residues in drinking water. In Chicago, recent tests found small amounts of a number of pharmaceutical compounds in water. Some of these residues reach the water supply through human waste, whereas others come from inappropriate disposal of unused medications.

I have been working with the local solid waste agencies, SWALCO in Lake County and SWANCC in Cook County, to examine the options for safe disposal of medicine. SWALCO offers disposal of pharmaceuticals as part of its Household Chemical Waste program. For details visit SWALCO's website. SWANCC has a special medicine dropoff program; click here for information on that.

This week in Springfield I am meeting with the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which represents the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. We will be talking about ways to make collection and safe disposal of unused pharmaceuticals easier without adding expense for consumers. I think this is an important issue to begin to address pro-actively, since we are still in the process of learning about the extent of the problem and what the possible impacts may be.

I will keep you informed about progress on this issue as it develops.

Update from $pringfield: Lawmakers' payraise debate turns personal

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 08 May 2008 19:28:00 +0000

Earlier in the week I blogged about my disapproval for raises for State Legislators. There's clearly a difference of opinion between me and a few members in the Senate Leadership. I can barely believe what I've been hearing in Springfield today. The Daily Herald article below says it all. As always please leave your comments about this issue!

Lawmakers' payraise debate turns personal
By John Patterson

SPRINGFIELD - Lawmakers and other state officials are likely to get pay raises because the Democratic leadership in the Illinois Senate does not plan to let members vote on whether to block the increases, lawmakers confirmed Thursday.

State Sen. Rickey Hendon, a Chicago Democrat, said he thinks the rejection effort is flawed and claims state House members are using the Illinois Senate as a political fall guy on the issue. Hendon said the Illinois House votes to reject the raises all the while expecting the Senate will block rejection and everyone ends up with more money.

"They want to use the Senate and pimp us, and they keep taking the money," Hendon said. He suggested the proposal be changed so anyone voting against the raises won't get them, even if they are ultimately approved.

As chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Hendon controls whether the plan to reject the raises ever sees the light of day.

Hendon also took issue with state Sen. Susan Garrett, a Lake Forest Democrat, leading the push to reject the raises.

"People should not miss out on the fact that she's a millionaire. She don't need it. Have you seen her house? Mind-boggling," Hendon said. "So it just blows my mind how the filthy rich are always the ones saying, we don't need the raise. No she don't."

Before talking to reporters, Hendon had gone over to Garrett on the Senate floor and suggested she should sign over her expense check to him.

"If she signed her name, I would have took it. She don't need it," Hendon said, calling Garrett the "esteemed senator from Richville."

Told of Hendon's comments, Garrett said the issue should not be personal.

"He's making this personal and that's unfortunate. We're not here to draw distinctions between wealthy legislators and non-wealthy legislators. We're here to make sure that what we do here in Springfield is above board and that the taxpayers are made aware of how we vote on crucial issues such as this," she said.

In the middle of Garrett talking to reporters, Senate President Emil Jones Jr., a Chicago Democrat who supports the raises, walked past and loudly quipped that he needed to get some "food stamps."

Garrett had this to say in response.

"Let me just say that some of the legislators have missed the point if they think that they need the raise because they're not making $150,000 a year," Garrett said. "We are here as public servants. We're not here to assume that we should be entitled to be receiving major increases every year when the rest of the state and other state employees are suffering."

The Illinois House voted Wednesday to reject the raises, but the Senate must approve the exact same proposal else the raises are automatic.

Demand for water expected to grow

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 07 May 2008 15:52:00 +0000

Over two years ago I worked with the Governor to get support for funding a water supply study because of sincere concerns about the sustainability and rapid depletion. Included in the study will be an implementation program to determine how we can protect our water supply in Northern Illinois. Even though Illinois is on the shores of Lake Michigan, one of the largest bodies of fresh water in the world, there are Supreme Court decisions that restrict states in how much water they can remove per year. I am continuing to monitor the study and look forward to the next step‚ a proposal of how we can conserve water. Below is an article that outlines the nature of the problem in Northern Illinois, I will keep you posted with the solutions.

Demand for water expected to grow
Conservation needed now, expert says

May 3, 2008

BY ED COLLINS

LIBERTYVILLE -- The availability of fresh water, which we often take for granted, is finally getting the environmental attention it deserves, planners say.

"To protect our future, we need to start talking about water conservation now," said Randy Blankenhorn, executive director of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, who opened a water supply planning briefing for county elected officials Friday at the county's Libertyville governmental campus.

The Illinois Department of Natural Resources says almost 16 billion gallons are used throughout the state daily, with 2 billion gallons not replenished.

Population growth projections for the 11-county Chicago metropolitan region through 2050 indicate that water will be in strong demand for both industry and households.

To prepare for these challenges CMAP is carrying out a state planning grant on regional water supply initiatives to project future estimates on water demand, prepare public conservation plans, and suggest environmental protections to preserve water quality.

State Sen. Susan Garrett, D-Lake Forest, called the subject "a huge, huge issue that needs to be addressed from a regional standpoint."

Garrett has been a legislative leader in fighting E. coli pollution of Lake Michigan's beaches. She told the group she was concerned about recent news reports regarding possible prescription drugs and toxic matter found in Lake Michigan drinking water.

Nearly 77 percent of residents in northeastern Illinois drink lake water daily. Another 19 percent use wells. Statistics show that the average person consumes or uses nearly 150 gallons of water daily.

Tim Loftus, a CMAP senior environmental planner who presented an update on water usage over the next 40 years, said it could range from an optimistic 2 percent growth rate to 59 percent.

Pay raises for legislators!?

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Mon, 05 May 2008 15:44:00 +0000

Last week I proposed a Resolution to reject any kind of pay raise for state legislators. When we can't balance the State budget and a down-turning economy is affecting many Illinoisans, I see no justification for state legislators to approve a pay raise whatsoever. I also believe that on the heels of the Recall bill (which did not pass, but which I voted for) a pay increase would send the wrong message to Illinois citizens who are understandably already fed up. The entire article is posted below. Your comments, as always, are welcomed.

Garrett decries legislator raises
An Illinois Senate resolution rejecting a proposed raise for state legislators was introduced Friday by Sen. Susan Garrett, D-Lake Forest.

The resolution rejects a 2008 report of the Compensation Review Board recommending a 3.8 percent cost of living adjustment increase in fiscal year 2009 for members of the executive and legislative branches.

Garrett said the Compensation Review Board report also recommends that the Legislature accept two previously rejected cost-of-living allowances that would result in a significant salary increase for Illinois public officials.

"I strongly believe every legislator should be of the mindset to completely reject another salary increase as the state faces hard economic times," said Garrett, who has been a member of the General Assembly since 1999. "This state can't pay its own bills, and there are thousands of people out of work.

"Those who are employed are not being offered raises. I don't believe there is any justification for a pay increase for state legislators," she said.

The General Assembly has 30 session days after the House and Senate next convene following the filing of the report to reject it in whole or reduce it.

Using the current session calendar, May 29 would be the 25th day, leaving five additional session days within which the report could be rejected, Garrett said.

Update from Springfield: The Recall Effort

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:23:00 +0000

This week in Springfield has been extraordinarily intense and busy because the recall effort (known to lawmakers as SJRCA 70) has been passing back and forth between the House and Senate. This amendment proposes to amend the Suffrage and Elections Article of the Illinois Constitution and provides for elections to recall not just the Governor and State executive branch officers, but also members of the General Assembly, and supreme, appellate, and circuit judges as well as sets forth requirements for petitions and elections. It also allows the General Assembly, by law, to provide for recall of officers of units of local government and school districts.

I am in favor of the recall. I believe it is a sound process to have in place when and if an elected official needs to be removed before they are up for re-election. I am concerned, however, that the addition of local government (i.e. alderman, local mayors, school district officials). The reason the House and Senate are trying to put a recall process in place is because of concern about corruption and competency within the Governor's office. I personally do not think the amendment should include aldermen, mayors, local judges and school officials because our goal as state lawmakers should be to first address the state officials, not local government. Additionally this could cause the amendment not to pass.

As of 9 a.m. this morning I believe this amendment has a good chance of passing, and I will vote for it despite the fact that it has been weighed down with these extra local provisions. The bigger picture is extremely important to the citizens of Illinois who are fed up and want to have a say into whether or not our Governor should continue to hold office.

A good source for the latest information on the recall can be found on The Capitol Fax Blog, which has been live-blogging the Recall initiative. I've also posted an up-to-date article below regarding this issue. Please feel free to send me your comments on this important issue.

Lawmakers think recall effort will die

April 29, 2008
By ANDREW HELLPAP

Democratic and Republican state lawmakers worried this week that senators will derail legislation aimed at removing Gov. Rod Blagojevich from office.

The Illinois Senate has until Sunday to vote on legislation for a state constitutional amendment. The same bill already passed the House.

State Sen. Donne Trotter, D-17, of Chicago, who picked up the bill for the Senate, must submit the same version or an amended bill this week because the deadline for the amendment to appear on the November ballot is Sunday, May 4.

Several local lawmakers, however, think Trotter's delay or any proposed changes to the bill will effectively kill it.
"Whether they can get it done today, the chances are zero," said Rep. Paul Froehlich, D-56, of Schaumburg.
Froehlich co-sponsored the House version of the bill.

If a Senate bill is introduced this week with changes, the bill would give the House until Sunday to approve it. However, the bill must first pass out of a committee and the full Senate.

The problem is the House isn't in session Friday through Sunday. Even though the House could call an emergency session, a new Senate recall version would still require three readings.

"He (Trotter) should have called for a vote two weeks ago when it was in committee," Froehlich said.
For the House to pass a Senate version, the body would have to do it today, he said.

Froehlich isn't alone in his lack of optimism for a recall amendment for both the executive and legislative branches.

"I personally have concerns," Sen. Susan Garrett, D-29, of Lake Forest said. "I have seen how this process can be manipulated."

"If they are trying to give the appearance they want to get this legislation passed and if they aren't engaged, then the recall won't be a constitutional provision," Garrett said.

Garrett is confident in the ability of the legislature to handle complex bills like a budget, she said.

To get the process moving, she planned to call a caucus to discuss the issue, Garrett said Tuesday.

Still, if changes are being considered, Garrett would like to see a higher voting threshold, around 50 percent, to recall a politician, she said.

In 2003, California Gov. Gray Davis was recalled. According to California law, residents had to gather signatures equaling 12 percent of the number of votes cast in an official's previous election. For Davis that meant 900,000 signatures.

Garrett is also worried about campaign spending. For example, a person with a lot of money to spend on a campaign could run against the recalled official who might not have had time to raise money for a campaign, Garrett said.

Discussion alone wouldn't slow the amendment, but Sen. Carole Pankau, R-23, of Roselle said, any changes to the House version would have the same effect as a new bill introduced by Trotter.

"It must pass the House and the Senate in the same form," she said.

Introduction of a new bill is simply a means of defending a fellow Democrat, namely Blagojevich, while maintaining the appearance of supporting a popular movement to recall him and other politicians, Pankau said.

"In an election year, they (the Democrats) are running from their own governor," she said.

Trotter's move is "bill-jacking," Froehlich said. Once a bill is passed out of the House, a senator must fill out a form to claim the bill, which Trotter did for the recall, Froehlich said. Then, submit it to the appropriate committee.

If Trotter doesn't do anything with the bill the recall dies, but any changes won't likely be approved in time anyway, Froehlich said.

Garrett authors bill to try to get park funds for Lake Forest, others

noreply@blogger.com (Lizzie) — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:22:00 +0000

As Spring is in full bloom, the parks throughout the state are starting to get more and more visitors. Many of them however, are not able to start on new projects and improvements because grant information has not been released. While I was in Springfield last week I authored a Senate Resolution calling for an audit of the Department of Natural Resources program that issues grants to park districts. I did this to learn how much money the state has for the grants and how much has already been spent—information the Blagojevich administration has held up releasing. My colleague Jeff Schoenberg clearly sums up the issue with his statement, "The park districts are ready to go [with new projects], but they are paralyzed because the Blagojevich administration will not formally tell them what they already know...if the parks could at least get formal notice that the money is coming, they could then borrow against the grant or manage their cash flow to begin their projects now." I've posted the full article which appeared in the Pioneer Press. As always feel free to leave comments or questions.

Garrett authors bill to try to get park funds for Lake Forest, others

April 24, 2008
By RANDY BLASER

Area legislators are pressuring the Blagojevich Administration to release state grants that are earmarked for improvements to parks in the suburbs and across the state.

With many suburban park districts eager to begin improvement projects, State Sen. Susan Garrett, D-29th, of Lake Forest authored a Senate Resolution April 16, calling for an audit of the Department of Natural Resources program that issues grants to park districts.

Called the Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development program, Garrett's home town of Lake Forest is one of 13 north and west suburban park districts in line for a grant. Lake Forest is expecting $400,000 for the development of the Route 60 Park.

Other suburban park districts in line for grants are Buffalo Grove, Evanston, Glenview, Grayslake, Hoffman Estates, Lake Forest, Lake in the Hills, Lake Villa Township, Lake Zurich, Morton Grove, Oak Park, River Forest and the Round Lake Area Park District.

Garrett said the point of the audit is to learn how much money the state has for the grants and how much has been spent. She said the Blagojevich administration has held up releasing the grants.

State Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, D-9th, who chaired a hearing on the issue April 16 in the Capitol, said the parks can't move forward on their projects without formal notification that the grant applications have been approved.

Evanston, in Schoenberg's district, is waiting for notification on a $400,000 grant for Foster Field redevelopment.
Danger of losing

"Park districts have gone out for bids on the projects, but can't open them because if they move ahead without the formal letter of approval, they lose the grant," he added. "The park districts are ready to go, but they are paralyzed because the Blagojevich administration will not formally tell them what they already know."

Schoenberg added if the parks could at least get formal notice that the money is coming, they could then borrow against the grant or manage their cash flow to begin their projects now.

"In this case, it is a classic 'Catch-22,'" he said.

The Open Space grants are funded through a real estate transfer tax, "so the money is already there," Schoenberg said.

However, the governor's office said the state doesn't have the money for the program. It is part of cuts Blagojevich wants to make to agriculture programs across the state, including the University of Illinois Extension Service.

Garrett said her recent calls to the governor's office have been unanswered, so she is seeking the audit. The audit would include the number and cost of grant applications between 2005 and 2007, and projects approved and completed during those years.